Red, White, and Blue in the Face!
Blogging about the inseparability of God, faith, and everyday life

Red, White, and Blue in the Face!

Finally, we have some transparency

January 31st, 2010 . by john

Though not quite what we’d hoped for. President Obama gave his State of the Union address and lo and behold suddenly he’s concerned about spending and debt! Never mind most of the country were shouting STOP! while the Democrats diddled away billions; never mind most of the country were shouting NO! as the Democrats tried to pay their way into a health care catastrophe; never mind Pelosi and friends hid behind closed doors while dealing over their health care reform; never mind . . . oh well, you get the point.

Suddenly now, President Obama understands that America does not want what he wants, does not believe in his kind of change? I don’t think so. The turnaround is too convenient, too, dare I say it . . . transparent?

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Technorati Favorites
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Share/Bookmark

What can Brown do for you today?

January 23rd, 2010 . by john

Unplug-logoHe can carry the message that the Americans in Massachusetts have given loudly and clearly to our government:

You are our representatives, not our masters. You work for us, not for yourselves. We are mad as heck and we’re not going to take any more of your arrogance.

I firmly believe Scott Brown was elected, not because he was a Republican, but because he was not a Democrat.

After years of slamming the Bush administration hard for being a “culture of corruption” the Democrats in just one short year have proven they only offer the same or worse!

We are a Democratic Republic with a representative government. When the government stops representing us it’s time to get rid of the government. Scott Brown may well be only the tip of the iceberg.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Technorati Favorites
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Share/Bookmark

We’re back!

January 23rd, 2010 . by admin

The blog has been down again for a few daywhile I moved from one hosting service (free but terrifically unreliable) to my totalchoicehosting.com site. This is actually on a subdomain of one of my other sites but that plus a little dns forwarding has allowed me to get the site up on a reliable hosting service. It will, hopefully, remain up now.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Technorati Favorites
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Share/Bookmark

Well said . . .

January 18th, 2010 . by john

The measure of a man

American Thinker via The Lonely Conservative

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Technorati Favorites
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Share/Bookmark

The “Terrible Triangle”

January 18th, 2010 . by john

Update: This post was prompted by my re-discovery of a website I find to be a remarkable treasure. What impressed me most were the photos of the faces of the Spanish clergy, religious, and lay people murdered in the Spanish Civil War. Here’s a link to Hagiography Circle; and this link directly to the page beginning the list of martyrs of the Spanish Civil War.

These days when one hears terms like “Terrible Triangle” thoughts immediately jump to latter day terrorism especially the Greater Middle East, southeast Asian island nations such as Malayasia, the Philippines etc. where such “triangles of terror” have probably been defined over time. The particular triangle I’m referring to though is one that Pope Pius XI tried to bring SpanishLeftistsShootStatueOfChrist to the attention of the world but which, especially the West, seemed to remain silent on.

The triangle of terror that Pope Pius XI was concerned about involved three countries – the Soviet Union, Spain, and Mexico. In all three countries socialism and communism, among other idealogies, had taken strong root — all of them due to the influence of the Marxist-Leninist philosophy from the Soviet Union who, as promised by Our Blessed Mother at Fatima, spread their terror world-wide. In each of these countries the Church suffered terrible persecution and loss yet rarely was this even mentioned in the press of the day. As the violence spread, beginning with the Soviet revolution in 1917, through the 20’s and 30’s, the ideology of Communism was spread through much of Eastern Europe and the Balkans where even more of the Church began to experience persecution. As with any topic involving human misery and suffering, particularly when that suffering involves the Catholic faithful  there is typically great accusation made against the Church attempting to “explain” why there was rebellion and violence against the Church, its people and property. Often the explanation involves the Church colluding with the rich and the landowners. Now I’ll be the first to concede that not every member of the Catholic Church, clergy, religious, or laity are innocent of some favoritism with the influential people, but the number of these versus the number of faithful, hardworking priests and religious pale when considered against the backdrop of the cold-blooded murder of so many of them in Russia, Spain, and Mexico in the 1920’s and 1930’s. Later, as WWII began the Communists, Nazis, Socialists and Facists made every attempt to obliterate the Church and remove any trace of God from the countries and cultures they tried subvert. In the end, history notes that none of these ideologies is acceptable to right-thinking and God-fearing people who, when given the choice will reject them all in favor of liberty, self-government, and religious freedom.

Today, as ever, these ideologies are a dangerous element putting freedom and democracy at risk wherever men and women are duped into believing them and some are well-intentioned. But not everyone espousing socialism or communism is good-hearted or has the best interest of the “people” at heart. On the contrary – more often than not it is the few who believe they are the answer to the worlds ills and that the masses of ignorant, poor, and working class of the populations are simply dragging everyone the world down. The common good is exchanged for something equally as insidious and hateful as the “class” structure they claim to replace. At least in the democracy we are free to render charity and aid to those in need (and we prove this in America every day by our giving to those in need both at home and abroad) and to worship the God who compells us to that charity. (I speak of charity here in the Christian sense of the word, that is, love).

Take off the blinders of bias, shut out the meaningless rhetoric, open your heart and mind and see the differences. Yes, America has poor, we have unemployed, we have rich exploiting the workers, we have clergy failing in their faithfulness but we have many, many more who, while wealthy, share their wealth willingly, who though not wealthy willingly share what they have with those in need, who daily struggle with difficults lives but who live those lives proudly and work hard for what they do have. There are thousands upon thousands of clergy and religious who have dedicated their lives entirely to serving God and His people, whoever they are, wherever they live, and no matter their state in life. In anything other than the type of democracy we have in America any or all of these things would be jeopardized for the good of a few at the cost to many.

Mary help us; Jesus save us!

The photo above courtesy Wikipedia:

 ”Execution” of the Sacred Heart by leftist militiamen at Cerro de los Ángeles near Madrid, on 7 August 1936, was the most famous of the widespread desecration of images and Churches.[1] King Alfonso XII had consecrated the nation to the Sacred Heart of Jesus at the spot on May 30, 1919.[2] The photograph was taken by a Paramount newsreel representative and originally published in the London Daily Mail with a caption calling it part of the “Spanish Reds’ war on religion.”[3]

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Technorati Favorites
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Share/Bookmark

“Human freedom does not legitimate bad moral choices”

January 15th, 2010 . by john

Nancy Pelosi’s Bishop, Archbishop Niederauer of San Francisco, has responded to another of Speaker Pelosi’s outrageous statements on her faith. Ms. Pelosi simply doesn’t get it and this time, in a December interview with Newsweek magazine, she pulled out the time-worn argument that our having free will makes choosing to kill a child by abortion permissable. She maintains the Catholic Church teaches that we all have “free will” thus also teaching that choosing abortion is wrong is restricting a woman’s free will.

“I am a practicing Catholic, although they’re probably not too happy about that. But it is my faith,” said the Speaker, referring to the Catholic Church hierarchy.  “I practically mourn this difference of opinion because I feel what I was raised to believe is consistent with what I profess, and that is that we are all endowed with, a free will and a responsibility to answer for our actions. And that women should have that opportunity to exercise their free will.”

Responding, Archbishop Neiderauer said

“embodied in that statement are some fundamental misconceptions about Catholic teaching on human freedom” – misconceptions he noted “are widespread both within the Catholic community and beyond.”

“Human freedom does not legitimate bad moral choices, nor does it justify a stance that all moral choices are good if they are free: ‘The exercise of freedom does not imply a right to say or do everything,’” wrote the archbishop, citing the Catechism of the Catholic Church.

“It is entirely incompatible with Catholic teaching to conclude that our freedom of will justifies choices that are radically contrary to the Gospel — racism, infidelity, abortion, theft,” he continued. 

“Freedom of will is the capacity to act with moral responsibility; it is not the ability to determine arbitrarily what constitutes moral right.”

“While we deeply respect the freedom of our fellow citizens,” Niederauer concluded, “we nevertheless are profoundly convinced that free will cannot be cited as justification for society to allow moral choices that strike at the most fundamental rights of others. Such a choice is abortion, which constitutes the taking of innocent human life, and cannot be justified by any Catholic notion of freedom.”

(via Lifesitenews.com )

Indeed, the good Archbishop knows whereof he speaks while Ms. Pelosi apparently knows little of what her Church truly teaches. It isn’t hard to find out what the teachings are – they are plainly described in the Catechism of the Catholic Church and in thousands upon thousands of other writings on the Church teachings done throughout the centuries. What you will find is the consistency the Church has shown in those teachings, thus, the root of Ms. Pelosi’s argument is that “the ends justify the means” while the Church teaches, as it has taught for centuries, “the ends do not justify the means” (CCC #1753).

Even more basic to Pelosi’s argument is the concept of “free will”. Madam Speaker seems to subsribe to a dissenting view of how one’s conscience works in determining the choices you make. If Pelosi is correct then no choice is made from ones “free will” but from ones own will. You decide what is right or wrong and you act upon that decision. In a technical sense I guess you could call that free will but in the truest sense I believe this is an abberant definition of “free will”! If each determines for himself the right or wrong of a choice and takes action on that choice based on their own determination of the morality without consideration for any norms we simply have anarchy and chaos. We do not have anarchy and chaos because we have moral truths upon which our laws are based, which we recognize, and which we obey. These laws, natural and man-made keep society functioning in social and productive ways. The Catholic Church teaches that in every heart the law of God is written – otherwise how do you explain the certainty with which even a toddler will experience knowing what is right or wrong without having had benefit of any teaching?

I make no claim to know what is in someone else’s heart much less what motivates Nancy Pelosi, but generally speaking when one decries the teaching of the Church the reason is simple – you want something you shouldn’t have.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Technorati Favorites
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Share/Bookmark